This is my 2020 book list. Working from home saved me an additional hour of commute; and that gave me more time to read.
Shoe Dog: A Memoir by the Creator of Nike, by Phil Knight. This was suggested to me by a coworker and I enjoyed reading it. I loved how he mixed his personal and his business accounts, as well his sense of mission.
The City and Man, by Leo Strauss. It took me a while to finish reading the three essays, and I wish I was introduced to Leo Strauss's writings earlier in my life, when I was struggling with understanding classical Greek philosophy in my twenties. I have read the subject material of the three essays (Plato's
Republic, Aristotle's
Politics, Thucydides'
Peloponnesian Wars) before, but I have struggled to relate them to today's world. Except perhaps the very early realization that I was not a big fan of the society and the system described by Plato in the
Republic. I have also not accepted the simplistic version of
Thucydides' Trap that is used in describing US-China relations as declining power-rising power dynamics.
The Lessons of History, by Will and Ariel Durant. Unlike the previous book (The City and Man), that took me multiple months of interrupted reading, I was able to finish this over one weekend night. It is a summary of their eleven volume
The Story of Civilization. I really loved how the chapters were divided into: earth, biology, race, character, morals, religion, economics, socialism, government, and war. And then ending with growth and decay and the final "
is progress real"? I really liked the speed and brevity of this book.
The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before Its Triumph, by Albert Hirschman was on my reading list for a while. And like Leo Strauss, I wish I had read Hirschman's writings earlier. The writing argues out what is mentioned in its subtitle:
political arguments for Capitalism before its triumph, by building up the intellectual and philosophical foundations from Machiavelli, Montesquieu, Sir James Steuart, John Millar, Adam Smith, Tocqueville, and Schumpeter. I did have to pause a number of times and understand the subject matter of the background material.
The Monk and the Philosopher: A father and son discuss the meaning of life, by Jean-Francois Revel is a collection of conversations that the French philosopher (
Revel) had with his son
Matthieu Ricard, the molecular biologist turned Buddhist monk. It is a fascinating dialog, that combines Jean-Francois' western enlightened skepticism with his son's explanation of monastic Buddhism to a mainly western audience. The book covers various aspects of the meaning of life, personal accounts of the ability of some monks to read minds and to understand rebirth; the current state of Tibetan Buddhism; as well as the history of spiritual thought in the East.
How to be an anti-racist, by Ibram X. Kendi, as part of my self-education on the complex and untaught history of racism in the US, and to learn how one can make a difference and change.
Rubaiyat of Khayyam, in Farsi, with English translations. I felt that I was finally ready to read the Farsi original. At first, I compared the literal text with
Edward Fitzgerald's interpretive translation and got a bit worried about how different they were.
For example:
roz ast khosh, o hawa na garm ast na sard (The day is great, and the wind is neither hot nor cold)
abr az rokh-e golzar hami shoeed gard (the rain clouds wash the dusted face of rose trees)
bulbul ba-zaban-e-pehlvi ba gul-e-zard (the nightingale, to the yellow rose, in the pehlvi language)
faryad hamee-zand ki: mai baaeed khord! (sings the complaint: wine for me!)
was translated to:
And David's lips are lock't but in divine
High piping Pehlevi, with "Wine! Wine! Red Wine!"
the Nightingale cries to the Rose
That yellow cheek of her's to incarnadine.
Then, when I started wondering what it really meant, and why the bird is singing in Pehlevi (old Persian) to the yellow rose; I realized that not only is the text untranslatable, any deep interpretation has to be in poetry as well. And that's when I realized what an admirable job Edward Fitzgerald did with his translation.
Everything in this: the day, the not-hot not-cold wind, the dusted faces of the rose trees, the rain clouds cleaning them, the nightingale singing in high Pehlvi, the yellow rose, and of course the wine, has a different meaning from the literal one; and it is close to impossible to tie them together in prose.
Swami Yogananda's book,
Wine of the Mystic, also helped me understand the deeper context of many of the quartrains (ruba'i). But frankly, I feel it will take me at least one lifetime of reading and understanding to get any close to the real meaning of the poetry.
Masnawi: in Farsi, with English translations, Rumi (Molavi). Reading this slowly, in the original, and slowly understanding the meaning has become a fun weekend activity for me. Here's a really interesting one (from
Qissa deedan khaleefa laila-ra: the story of the Caliph's seeing Laila):
har ki beedar ast aw dar khwab tar, hast beedaarish az khwabash batar
chon ba haq beedar nabood jaan-e-ma, hast beedari cho dar bandan ma
"Whoever is awake (to the material world) is more asleep to the spiritual world, his wakefulness is worse than sleep. When our soul is not awake (to God), wakefulness is like closing our doors (to Divine influences)"
If you ask someone who has read the Bhagavad Gita what this reminds them of, they will probably point to Bhagavad Gita 2.69:
ya nisha sarvabhutanam, tasyam jagarti samyami
yasyam jagrati bhutani, sa nisha pashyato muneh
"What is night for all beings is the time of waking for the disciplined soul; and what is the time of waking for all beings is night for the sage who sees (or the sage of vision)"
The question is, whether these are independent thoughts, or one influenced the other? Molavi's poetry is full of verses that make one wonder. Like the Rubaiyat, I think it will take me more than one entire lifetime to understand the real meaning of Molavi's poetry.
Principles: Life and Work, by Ray Dalio. This started coming up in my Facebook promoted feed and I bought the book after watching the
summary video. A lot of the principles match mine, and is a good framework for building a meritocratic and accountable work culture.
Deep Medicine: How Artificial Intelligence can make healthcare human again, by Eric Topol. The book starts with the issues of how medicine in practiced today, including the authors own, personal, and painful experiences. He covers the advances of artificial intelligence and gives a good overview of how that can be (will be, is being) applied to generate better diagnosis, detecting mental health issues, drug discovery, neuroscience research, diet management, and becoming a virtual medical assistant. I would highly recommend it to someone who is remotely interested in the future of medicine and health care.
World Order, by Henry Kissinger. I came across this book while I was trying to finish one of my blog posts. It gave me a good mental framework to think about contemporary geopolitics in the context of a multi-century narrative. The part that impressed me a lot was the how he started the South Asian chapter with a brief overview of Kautilya's Arthashastra, and the Bhagavad Gita.
Poems of Love and War, from the Tamil Sangam literature written between 100 BCE and 250 CE. It was mainly my curiosity that got me to understand the elements of Tamil classical culture. I felt that the English translation did a good job (I don't speak the language) but may have simplified the overall meaning.
The Three Body problem, Cixin Liu. This had been recommended by too many smart people to ignore, and I succeeded finishing it in my second attempt. The initial account of the horrors of the cultural revolution turned me off, but the book ended in an interesting way. I am reading the sequel now.
India in the Persianate Age (1000-1765) and
The Rise of Islam and the Bengal Frontier (1204-1760) by Richard Eaton. I had fun reading both of them together. Farsi was India's official and court language for more than 500 years, from the 13th century to the late 18th century. It was also interesting to note how these two books documented the two major regime changes India (South Asia) went through. The first was a transition from a Sanskritized age to the Persianate age. And then, from a Persianate age to the Anglicized age. The second book, about the medieval history of Bengal covers the expansion of Islam in Bengal, that eventually caused the political division of the region.
Humayun-nama, from the
Three memoirs of Humayun (1508-1556) written by Humayun's sister, Gulbadan Begum. Humayun was the second Mughal emperor, who presided over a very shaky empire and lost his empire for 15 years until he regained it with some help. The memoirs cover the events from his birth to the reconquest in 1555. It felt like a continuation of the Baburnama, but from a different point of view.
Disunited Nations: The Scramble for Power in an Ungoverned World, by Peter Zeihan. I got introduced to Peter Zeihan's lectures through Youtube's recommendation engine. Peter Zeihan happens to be a very funny and
engaging presenter. The overall premise of the book is that the global system that the US built against the Soviets where nations were essentially
bribed to be on our side is coming to an end. And the new system is going to look very different and chaotic, because the US can afford to de-globalize.
Audiobook:
Genghis Khan and the making of the modern world, by Jack Weatherford. This was the second listening. It was well narrated (and written), and I liked how the author connected the different threads together: the historical context of what was going on in the world, the basics of Mongol culture and tribal laws, and the long-term global impact of Mongol rule.
This is probably a year that I didn't read a book on investing after a long time.
My previous book lists:
